Xeon E5-2698 v4 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83
+16.6%
Xeon E5-2698 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 135 Watt
14.43

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v4 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking392500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.73
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency45.5410.12
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,226

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1640
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB5 MB
L3 cache16 MB50 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP7/FP8FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83
+16.6%
Xeon E5-2698 v4 14.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26730
+16.6%
Xeon E5-2698 v4 22929

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2228
+109%
Xeon E5-2698 v4 1065

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10627
+30.2%
Xeon E5-2698 v4 8161

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.83 14.43
Recency 13 June 2023 20 June 2016
Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 40
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 135 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 16.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2698 v4, on the other hand, has 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2698 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2698 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon E5-2698 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Xeon E5-2698 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 119 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Xeon E5-2698 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.