Ryzen 9 7945HX3D vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 341 | 79 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (less than a year ago) | 28 July 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 89 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by 119% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by 119% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by 26% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by 52% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by 130% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by 16% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.12 | 37.44 |
| Integrated graphics card | 18.35 | 2.86 |
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 28 July 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
