Ryzen 7 8840U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads
16.95
+1.7%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking340350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)no data
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Release date13 June 2023 (less than a year ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP8FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.95
+1.7%
Ryzen 7 8840U 16.67

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26214
+1.7%
Ryzen 7 8840U 25784

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2237
Ryzen 7 8840U 2342
+4.7%

Ryzen 7 8840U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by 5% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10790
+11.6%
Ryzen 7 8840U 9668

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by 12% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.95 16.67
Recency 13 June 2023 6 December 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 7 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
Ryzen 7 8840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 37 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Ryzen 7 8840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.