Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.68
+305%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.12

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by a whopping 305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4491517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency45.9726.50
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache512 KB384 KB
L2 cache8 MB2 MB
L3 cache16 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7/FP8FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.68
+305%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26810
+305%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6627

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2221
+156%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 868

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10587
+316%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2545

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+162%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 5635

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+341%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 553

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+101%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 134

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037
+252%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3135

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 6496
+58.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4102

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 66442
+2278%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2794

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 203
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 1007
+396%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
+113%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 887

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.68 4.12
Integrated graphics card 17.54 4.37
Recency 13 June 2023 8 January 2018
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 304.9% higher aggregate performance score, 301.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 62 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 139 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.