Ryzen 5 7535U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.12
+61.8%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 5 7535U by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 7535U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking343683
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)no data
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Rembrandt-R
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 7535U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm6 nm
Die size178 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 7535U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP8FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 7535U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 7535U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 7535U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 7535U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 17.12
+61.8%
Ryzen 5 7535U 10.58

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 5 7535U by 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26486
+61.8%
Ryzen 5 7535U 16371

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 5 7535U by 62% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2237
+30.7%
Ryzen 5 7535U 1712

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 5 7535U by 31% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10789
+65.9%
Ryzen 5 7535U 6505

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 5 7535U by 66% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.12 10.58
Integrated graphics card 18.36 9.77
Recency 13 June 2023 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7535U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 7535U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
Ryzen 5 7535U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 43 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 57 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Ryzen 5 7535U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.