Itanium 9150N vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 543 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 18.44 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | no data |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 October 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Itanium 9150N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 16 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 24 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 76 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Itanium 9150N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | PPGA611 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Itanium 9150N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Itanium 9150N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Itanium 9150N are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 1 October 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 104 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has an age advantage of 15 years, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 197% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Intel Itanium 9150N. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while Itanium 9150N is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
