Celeron J4125 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83
+805%
Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Celeron J4125 by a whopping 805% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3921998
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.55
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)no data
Power efficiency45.5117.60
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache512 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB4 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP8FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83
+805%
Celeron J4125 1.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26730
+804%
Celeron J4125 2957

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2228
+544%
Celeron J4125 346

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10627
+1002%
Celeron J4125 964

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+295%
Celeron J4125 3740

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+904%
Celeron J4125 243

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+257%
Celeron J4125 75

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037
+692%
Celeron J4125 1394

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 203
Celeron J4125 2391
+1078%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
+315%
Celeron J4125 455

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 6496
+174%
Celeron J4125 2369

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 66442
+787%
Celeron J4125 7494

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 363
+309%
Celeron J4125 89

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1620
+376%
Celeron J4125 340

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 242
+255%
Celeron J4125 68

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 327
Celeron J4125 7856
+2302%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.83 1.86
Integrated graphics card 18.32 0.87
Recency 13 June 2023 4 November 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 804.8% higher aggregate performance score, 2005.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J4125, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while Celeron J4125 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron J4125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1536 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Celeron J4125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.