A9-9400 SoC vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 470 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 18.42 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A9-9400 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A9-9400 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A9-9400 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A9-9400 SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A9-9400 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | Radeon R5 3CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A9-9400 SoC.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 31 May 2016 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
A9-9400 SoC, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and AMD A9-9400 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while A9-9400 SoC is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
