Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by a whopping 2009% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 778 | 3093 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Rembrandt (Zen 3+) | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 20 April 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.75 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP7 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB + 16 MB | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.39 | 0.54 |
| Recency | 20 April 2022 | 1 May 2008 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 1 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z has a 2009.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron Dual-Core T1600, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
