Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
10.51
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.16
+53.8%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking760438
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency63.8952.63
Architecture codenameCezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date19 April 2022 (2 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size180 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 10.51
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 16.16
+53.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 16078
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 24732
+53.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 1530
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2151
+40.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 5269
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9527
+80.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.51 16.16
Integrated graphics card 9.03 18.27
Recency 19 April 2022 3 May 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has 86.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has a 53.8% higher aggregate performance score, 102.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.