Core 2 Duo T7500 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by a whopping 1883% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 689 | 2748 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 19 April 2022 (2 years ago) | 8 May 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $234 |
| Current price | no data | $62 (0.3x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.075V - 1.25V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP6 | PBGA479,PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by 1883% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by 1872% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by 537% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by 1330% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.51 | 0.53 |
| Recency | 19 April 2022 | 8 May 2007 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T7500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core 2 Duo T7500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
