Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.76
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.20
+32.3%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking540333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency37.1849.18
Architecture codenameCezanne (2021−2024)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 June 2021 (3 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size180 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE 13.76
Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.20
+32.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE 21859
Ryzen 7 7840HS 28903
+32.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE 1943
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2367
+21.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE 7005
Ryzen 7 7840HS 11010
+57.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.76 18.20
Integrated graphics card 4.51 18.32
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm

Ryzen 7 7840HS has a 32.3% higher aggregate performance score, 306.2% faster integrated GPU, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 27 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1688 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE or Ryzen 7 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.