Ryzen 5 PRO 215 vs Ryzen 7 H 260
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 H 260 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 215 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 449 | 891 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 H 260 and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 H 260 and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 MB + 16 MB | 6 MB + 16 MB |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.67 | 10.15 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen 7 H 260 has a 64.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 215, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
