Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Ryzen 7 H 260
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 H 260 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a whopping 10987% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 450 | 3572 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Solo |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | no data | 1 April 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $262 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 H 260 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 H 260 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 MB + 16 MB | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and Core 2 Solo SU3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 H 260 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.63 | 0.15 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 5 Watt |
Ryzen 7 H 260 has a 10986.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
Core 2 Solo SU3500, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
