Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G vs Ryzen 7 8845HS
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 335 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 89 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 38.19 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | no data |
| Release date | 6 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 20 November 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP8 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 December 2023 | 20 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 8845HS has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 8845HS and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
