Ryzen 7 260 vs Ryzen 7 8840U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 8840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
14.54
Ryzen 7 260
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
15.36
+5.6%

Ryzen 7 260 outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking534492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency49.7132.67
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 8840U and Ryzen 7 260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors25,000 million25,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 8840U and Ryzen 7 260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8FP8
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Ryzen 7 260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Ryzen 7 260 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Ryzen 7 260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Ryzen 7 260.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 8840U 14.54
Ryzen 7 260 15.36
+5.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 8840U 9258
Ryzen 7 260 9848
+6.4%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 8840U 6012
Ryzen 7 260 6439
+7.1%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 8840U 57550
Ryzen 7 260 63076
+9.6%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 8840U 241
Ryzen 7 260 261
+8.4%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 8840U 405
+25.8%
Ryzen 7 260 322

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 8840U 10366
+1.8%
Ryzen 7 260 10180

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 8840U 2528
Ryzen 7 260 2622
+3.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.54 15.36
Recency 6 December 2023 6 January 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 7 8840U has 60.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 260, on the other hand, has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen 7 8840U and AMD Ryzen 7 260.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
Ryzen 7 8840U
AMD Ryzen 7 260
Ryzen 7 260

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 210 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 8840U and Ryzen 7 260, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.