Atom x7213RE vs Ryzen 7 8840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.26
+1141%
Atom x7213RE
2024
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
1.23

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Atom x7213RE by a whopping 1141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 8840HS and Atom x7213RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4612322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency51.5812.93
Architecture codenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 8840HS and Atom x7213RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 8840HS and Atom x7213RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8840HS and Atom x7213RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8840HS and Atom x7213RE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8840HS and Atom x7213RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 16EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8840HS and Atom x7213RE.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes209

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 8840HS 15.26
+1141%
Atom x7213RE 1.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 8840HS 24244
+1139%
Atom x7213RE 1957

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.26 1.23
Recency 6 December 2023 8 April 2024
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 9 Watt

Ryzen 7 8840HS has a 1140.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Atom x7213RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 211.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7213RE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 8840HS and Atom x7213RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Intel Atom x7213RE
Atom x7213RE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 192 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7213RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 8840HS or Atom x7213RE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.