FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 8700G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 8700G
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
20.49
+667%

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 667% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 8700G and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2481627
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.591.32
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenamePhoenixVishera (2012−2015)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$299 $64

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 8700G has 4414% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 8700G and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads166
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size178 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors25,000 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 8700G and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-1866

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780MOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and FX-6300.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 8700G 20.49
+667%
FX-6300 2.67

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms FX-6300 by 667% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 8700G 31698
+666%
FX-6300 4137

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms FX-6300 by 666% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 8700G 2685
+482%
FX-6300 461

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms FX-6300 by 482% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 8700G 14006
+867%
FX-6300 1448

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms FX-6300 by 867% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.49 2.67
Recency 8 January 2024 23 October 2012
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 6
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Ryzen 7 8700G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 8700G and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 136 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3806 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 8700G or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.