Athlon X4 760K vs Ryzen 7 8700G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 8700G
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.77
+963%
Athlon X4 760K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.86

Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Athlon X4 760K by a whopping 963% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 8700G and Athlon X4 760K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2962032
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.40no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency28.951.77
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date8 January 2024 (1 year ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 8700G and Athlon X4 760K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192K
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size178 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors25,000 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 8700G and Athlon X4 760K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and Athlon X4 760K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, NX-Bit, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XDNA2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and Athlon X4 760K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and Athlon X4 760K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-1866

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8700G and Athlon X4 760K.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 8700G 19.77
+963%
Athlon X4 760K 1.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 8700G 31671
+963%
Athlon X4 760K 2980

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 8700G 2665
+508%
Athlon X4 760K 438

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 8700G 13738
+1222%
Athlon X4 760K 1039

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.77 1.86
Recency 8 January 2024 1 June 2013
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

Ryzen 7 8700G has a 962.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 8700G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 760K in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Athlon X4 760K

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 312 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 272 votes

Rate Athlon X4 760K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 8700G and Athlon X4 760K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.