FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 7840S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.93
+497%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3991627
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)no data
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current priceno data$64

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads166
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache512 KB288 KB
L2 cache8 MB6144 KB
L3 cache16 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size178 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-1866

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780MOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and FX-6300.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840S 15.93
+497%
FX-6300 2.67

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms FX-6300 by 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 7840S 24635
+495%
FX-6300 4137

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms FX-6300 by 495% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.93 2.67
Recency 5 January 2023 23 October 2012
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 6
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7840S is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook processor while FX-6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3809 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840S or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.