Athlon XP-M 2000+ vs Ryzen 7 7840S
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 661 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 16.05 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 5 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 17 June 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $134 |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen 7 7840S and Athlon XP-M 2000+: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.53 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 11.5 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Athlon XP-M 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Athlon XP-M 2000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Athlon XP-M 2000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2023 | 17 June 2003 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7840S has an age advantage of 19 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 2000+, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 7 7840S and AMD Athlon XP-M 2000+. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
