Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs Ryzen 7 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.21
+58.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
11.50

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking332685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency49.2472.56
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release dateJanuary 2023 (1 year ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.21
+58.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 11.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 28920
+58.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 18265

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 2367
+9.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 2154

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 11008
+39.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 7887

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.21 11.50
Integrated graphics card 18.32 8.31
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840HS has a 58.3% higher aggregate performance score, 120.5% faster integrated GPU, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1683 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840HS or Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.