Processor N200 vs Ryzen 7 7840H
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 7840H outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 1073% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 301 | 2025 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix | Alder Lake-N |
| Release date | January 2023 (1 year ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5600 | DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 780M | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.41 | 1.57 |
| Integrated graphics card | 18.35 | 3.04 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
The Ryzen 7 7840H is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840H and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
