Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen 7 7735H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7735H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.65
+6.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 54 Watt
14.73

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking408450
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameRembrandt-H RefreshPhoenix (Zen4)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography6 nm4 nm
Die size208 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP7no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7735H 15.65
+6.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 14.73

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 7735H 24213
+6.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22778

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 6% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 7735H 6438
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6888
+7%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 7735H 35222
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 39399
+11.9%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 12% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 7735H 12924
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 12948
+0.2%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 7735H 21
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22
+2.2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 7735H 1825
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 1863
+2.1%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 2% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 7735H 246
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 249
+1.2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 1% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 7735H 2.91
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2.97
+2.1%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7735H 10.6
+1.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 10.4

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 2% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7735H 5997
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6717
+12%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 12% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7735H 104
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 110
+5.6%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 6% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7735H 252
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 264
+5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 5% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.65 14.73
Integrated graphics card 17.35 15.28
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 54 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 208 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7735H or Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.