Ultra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 7 7435HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
15.04
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.07
+146%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Ryzen 7 7435HS by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking47289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesRyzen 7000 Seriesno data
Power efficiency31.6328.07
Architecture codenameRembrandt RArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2023 (1 year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache512 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm3 nm
Die size210 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7r21851
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7435HS 15.04
Ultra 7 265KF 37.07
+146%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7435HS 23883
Ultra 7 265KF 58883
+147%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.04 37.07
Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 7 7435HS has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 146.5% higher aggregate performance score, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7435HS in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7435HS is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7435HS and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
Ryzen 7 7435HS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 609 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7435HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7435HS or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.