A4 PRO-3340B vs EPYC 4464P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4464P
2024, $399
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
27.07
+2662%

EPYC 4464P outperforms A4 PRO-3340B by a whopping 2662% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2332742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.85no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency10.881.65
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2025)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date21 May 2024 (1 year ago)20 December 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache32 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm28 nm
Die size2x 71 mm2107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °C90 °C
Number of transistors13,140 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FT3
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3/DDR3L-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsAMD Radeon™ HD 8240 Graphics
iGPU core countno data2
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes288

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 4464P 27.07
+2662%
A4 PRO-3340B 0.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 4464P 47383
+2656%
Samples: 24
A4 PRO-3340B 1719
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.07 0.98
Recency 21 May 2024 20 December 2014
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 25 Watt

EPYC 4464P has a 2662% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

A4 PRO-3340B, on the other hand, has 320% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4 PRO-3340B in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation processor while A4 PRO-3340B is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A4 PRO-3340B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 4464P and A4 PRO-3340B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.