Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Ryzen 7 5800X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5800X
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
18.03
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.26
+1.3%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 7 5800X by a minimal 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking309302
Place by popularity85not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.49no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen 3)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date5 November 2020 (3 years ago)13 June 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449no data
Current price$353 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache32 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size2 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

PCIe version4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5800X 18.03
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 18.26
+1.3%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 7 5800X by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 5800X 27895
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28242
+1.2%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 7 5800X by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 5800X 2180
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2295
+5.3%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 7 5800X by 5% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 5800X 10264
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 10978
+7%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 7 5800X by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 5800X 2609
+10.5%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS by 11% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 5800X 266
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275
+3.6%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 7 5800X by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.03 18.26
Recency 5 November 2020 13 June 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Note that Ryzen 7 5800X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5230 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 32 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5800X or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.