EPYC 9654P vs Ryzen 7 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5800
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.68
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
73.67
+342%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.346.85
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameVermeer (2020−2022)Genoa
Release date5 November 2020 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,625
Current price$320 $5987 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5800 has 431% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads16192
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size81 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,150 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5800 16.68
EPYC 9654P 73.67
+342%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 5800 25795
EPYC 9654P 113949
+342%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by 342% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.68 73.67
Recency 5 November 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 16 192
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5800 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 5800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 233 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5800 or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.