EPYC 9124 vs Ryzen 7 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5800
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.67
EPYC 9124
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
28.28
+69.6%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9124 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking360155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.0724.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameVermeer (2020−2022)Genoa
Release date5 November 2020 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083
Current price$317 $1115 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5800 has 55% better value for money than EPYC 9124.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9124 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size81 mm24x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,150 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9124 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9124. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9124 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9124. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9124.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5800 16.67
EPYC 9124 28.28
+69.6%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 5800 25787
EPYC 9124 43743
+69.6%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by 70% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 5800 2053
+12.1%
EPYC 9124 1832

Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms EPYC 9124 by 12% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 5800 8756
EPYC 9124 13428
+53.4%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by 53% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.67 28.28
Recency 5 November 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

The EPYC 9124 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5800 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 5800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9124 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 9124, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
AMD EPYC 9124
EPYC 9124

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 233 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5800 or EPYC 9124, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.