EPYC 7662 vs Ryzen 7 5800
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800 by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 538 | 79 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 9.54 | 7.74 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 5 November 2020 (5 years ago) | 19 February 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 34 | 20 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 32 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,150 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | Socket SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5800 and EPYC 7662.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.60 | 41.00 |
| Recency | 5 November 2020 | 19 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 64 |
| Threads | 16 | 128 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
Ryzen 7 5800 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 246.2% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7662, on the other hand, has a 180.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
The AMD EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 5800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
