Ryzen 7 7840S vs Ryzen 7 5700G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5700G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.89
Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.93
+0.3%

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking398395
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.99no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameCezanne (Zen 3)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date13 April 2021 (3 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359no data
Current price$1050 (2.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die sizeAM4 (1331) mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5700G 15.89
Ryzen 7 7840S 15.93
+0.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 5700G 24577
Ryzen 7 7840S 24635
+0.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 5700G 6196
Ryzen 7 7840S 7579
+22.3%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 22% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 5700G 38827
Ryzen 7 7840S 45931
+18.3%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 18% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 5700G 14324
Ryzen 7 7840S 14547
+1.6%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 2% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 5700G 4.33
+136%
Ryzen 7 7840S 10.2

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 136% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 5700G 24
Ryzen 7 7840S 29
+21.3%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 21% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 5700G 2107
Ryzen 7 7840S 2223
+5.5%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 5% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 5700G 243
Ryzen 7 7840S 274
+13%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 13% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 5700G 2.86
Ryzen 7 7840S 3.33
+16.4%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 16% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 5700G 10.5
Ryzen 7 7840S 12.9
+22.9%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 23% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 5700G 7681
Ryzen 7 7840S 20369
+165%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 165% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.89 15.93
Integrated graphics card 9.07 18.36
Recency 13 April 2021 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S.

Note that Ryzen 7 5700G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 7840S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3212 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5700G or Ryzen 7 7840S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.