Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Ryzen 7 5700G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5700G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.46
+7.1%
Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.43

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Ryzen 7 6800HS by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking445493
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.63no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency22.5139.02
Architecture codenameCezanne (Zen 3) (2021)Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date13 April 2021 (3 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die sizeAM4 (1331) mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5700G 15.46
+7.1%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 14.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 5700G 24551
+7.1%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 22925

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 5700G 2007
+10.2%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 1821

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 5700G 8864
+2.1%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 8684

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 5700G 6196
Ryzen 7 6800HS 6258
+1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 5700G 38827
Ryzen 7 6800HS 41339
+6.5%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 5700G 14324
+3.1%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 13890

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 5700G 24
Ryzen 7 6800HS 26
+11.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 5700G 2107
+6%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 1987

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 5700G 243
+3.6%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 234

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 5700G 2.86
+2.5%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 2.79

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 5700G 10.5
Ryzen 7 6800HS 11.4
+8.6%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 5700G 123
+8.5%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 114

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 5700G 274
+7.5%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 255

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 5700G 7681
+14.4%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 6716

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 5700G 8681
Ryzen 7 6800HS 9298
+7.1%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 5700G 233
Ryzen 7 6800HS 258
+10.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 5700G 1579
+5.8%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 1492

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 5700G 5814
+5.8%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 5495

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 5700G 59702
+6.3%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 56170

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 5700G 290
+3.4%
Ryzen 7 6800HS 280

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.46 14.43
Integrated graphics card 9.04 15.98
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 5700G has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 6800HS, on the other hand, has 76.8% faster integrated GPU, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS.

Note that Ryzen 7 5700G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 6800HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 7 6800HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
Ryzen 7 6800HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3663 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 187 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5700G or Ryzen 7 6800HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.