Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Ryzen 7 4800HS

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 4800HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
12.07
+21.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
9.93

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking578697
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameRenoir-HS (Zen 2)Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years old)7 May 2020 (3 years old)
Current price$1141 no data

Technical specs

Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s68.27 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 7AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 4800HS 12.07
+21.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9.93

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 18491
+21.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15205

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 22% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 1437
+6.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1349

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 7% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 6044
+17.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 5147

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 17% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 5705
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8379
+46.9%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 47% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 36313
+22.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 29574

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 12785
+16.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 11008

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 16% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 4.11
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 3.95
+4.1%

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 4% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 20
+26.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 16

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 26% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 1701
+20.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1410

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 21% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 187
+3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 181

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 3% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 2.19
+3.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 2.12

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 3% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 10.3
+46.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 7.1

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 46% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 4642
+9.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 4227

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 10% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 217
+7.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 202

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 7% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 4800HS 99
+23.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 80

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 24% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 12.07 9.93
Recency 6 January 2020 7 May 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 4800HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 4800HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
Ryzen 7 4800HS
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 248 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 122 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 4800HS or Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.