Xeon X3320 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 3700X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.73
+1033%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon X3320 by a whopping 1033% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon X3320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5062293
Place by popularity73not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency20.661.25
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)no data
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon X3320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads16no data
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHzno data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache32 MB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon X3320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon X3320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FSB parityno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon X3320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon X3320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon X3320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3700X 14.73
+1033%
Xeon X3320 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 3700X 22541
+1035%
Xeon X3320 1986

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.73 1.30
Recency 27 May 2019 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 7 3700X has a 1033.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 3700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3320 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 3700X is a desktop processor while Xeon X3320 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon X3320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Xeon X3320
Xeon X3320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5283 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3700X or Xeon X3320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.