Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs Ryzen 7 3700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 3700X
2019, $329
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
12.72
Ryzen Z2 Extreme
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 8 Watt
13.71
+7.8%

Ryzen Z2 Extreme outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking662605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.21no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Power efficiency20.98no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Z2 Extreme basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB8 MB
L3 cache32 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm4 nm
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Z2 Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt8 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Z2 Extreme are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 890M

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 3700X 12.72
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 13.71
+7.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 3700X 22430
Samples: 24433
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 24177
+7.8%
Samples: 7

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 3700X 5839
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 8361
+43.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 3700X 40439
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 43834
+8.4%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 3700X 3.71
+116%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 8

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 3700X 2092
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 2261
+8.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 3700X 204
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 275
+34.8%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 3700X 11.4
+8.6%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 10.5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.72 13.71
Recency 27 May 2019 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 8 Watt

Ryzen Z2 Extreme has a 7.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 712.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme.

Note that Ryzen 7 3700X is a desktop processor while Ryzen Z2 Extreme is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 6232 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 58 votes

Rate Ryzen Z2 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Z2 Extreme, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.