EPYC 9654P vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.70
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
74.62
+669%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by a whopping 669% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8006
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.491.96
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date22 February 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$10,625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 1700 has 129% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads16192
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3024
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16384 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size213 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3-
AVX++
SenseMI+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 9.70
EPYC 9654P 74.62
+669%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14817
EPYC 9654P 113949
+669%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.70 74.62
Recency 22 February 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 16 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700 has 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654P, on the other hand, has a 669.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 1700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1499 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.