EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.32
EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+609%

EPYC 9474F outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by a whopping 609% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9474F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking82411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.915.58
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.5717.38
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$6,780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9474F has 43% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9474F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads1696
Base clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3036
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16384 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9474F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9474F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3-
AVX++
SenseMI+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9474F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9474F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9474F.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 9.32
EPYC 9474F 66.11
+609%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14806
EPYC 9474F 105010
+609%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.32 66.11
Recency 2 March 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 48
Threads 16 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700 has 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9474F, on the other hand, has a 609.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 1700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9474F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and EPYC 9474F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1544 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or EPYC 9474F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.