Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 8033% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 693 | 3557 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Solo |
| Power efficiency | 14.83 | 1.16 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix2 (2024) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 16 April 2024 (1 year ago) | 20 August 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $262 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Core 2 Solo SU3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 137 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 20,900 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Core 2 Solo SU3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM5 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Core 2 Solo SU3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Core 2 Solo SU3300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Core 2 Solo SU3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Core 2 Solo SU3300.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 14 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.20 | 0.15 |
| Recency | 16 April 2024 | 20 August 2008 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 5 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has a 8033.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Solo SU3300, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
