A12-9720P vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
2022
6 cores / 12 threads
10.82
+529%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by a whopping 529% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A12-9720P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6511931
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameRembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 April 2022 (2 years ago)1 June 2016 (7 years ago)
Current priceno data$502

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A12-9720P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography6 nm28 nm
Die size208 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A12-9720P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP7FP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A12-9720P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A12-9720P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A12-9720P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 660MAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A12-9720P.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 10.82
+529%
A12-9720P 1.72

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 529% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 16736
+530%
A12-9720P 2657

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 530% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 1682
+222%
A12-9720P 523

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 222% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 6420
+446%
A12-9720P 1175

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 446% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 6062
+121%
A12-9720P 2743

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 121% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 32262
+338%
A12-9720P 7361

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 338% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 7.74
+68.1%
A12-9720P 13.01

A12-9720P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U by 68% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 16
+511%
A12-9720P 3

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 511% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 1460
+522%
A12-9720P 235

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 522% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 233
+221%
A12-9720P 73

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 221% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 2.79
+197%
A12-9720P 0.94

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 197% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 5.5
+206%
A12-9720P 1.8

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A12-9720P by 206% in TrueCrypt AES.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.82 1.72
Integrated graphics card 9.75 1.95
Recency 19 April 2022 1 June 2016
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm

The Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9720P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A12-9720P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
AMD A12-9720P
A12-9720P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 28 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 427 votes

Rate A12-9720P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U or A12-9720P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.