Celeron M P4500 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE outperforms Celeron M P4500 by a whopping 1739% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 866 | 3077 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 31.55 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 June 2021 (4 years ago) | 1 April 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE and Celeron M P4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 2500 MHz |
| Multiplier | 34 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE and Celeron M P4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | PGA988 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 512 KB + 2 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE and Celeron M P4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE and Celeron M P4500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE and Celeron M P4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 7 (Radeon Graphics 448SP) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE and Celeron M P4500.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.30 | 0.56 |
| Recency | 1 June 2021 | 1 April 2010 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 512 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE has a 1739.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1362.9% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M P4500 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE is a desktop processor while Celeron M P4500 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
