Athlon XP 3200+ vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 559 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne (2021−2024) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 1 June 2021 (3 years ago) | January 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 39 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 77 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 77 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process, and 18.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Athlon XP 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
