Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1109 | 439 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 52.59 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.04 | 16.15 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U has a 167.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
