A6-9225 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.30
+400%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by a whopping 400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12962463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price$611 $451

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and A6-9225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFP5BGA
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and A6-9225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and A6-9225 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and A6-9225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and A6-9225.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4.30
+400%
A6-9225 0.86

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6652
+398%
A6-9225 1335

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 398% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 887
+227%
A6-9225 271

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 227% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2546
+462%
A6-9225 453

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 462% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4349
+71.8%
A6-9225 2532

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 72% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 14336
+242%
A6-9225 4193

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 242% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 5635
+164%
A6-9225 2132

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 164% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12.36
+113%
A6-9225 26.28

A6-9225 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 113% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6
+390%
A6-9225 1

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 390% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 553
+410%
A6-9225 109

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 410% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 134
+83.6%
A6-9225 73

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 84% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 1.55
+82.4%
A6-9225 0.85

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 82% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3.4
+237%
A6-9225 1

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 237% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2700
+217%
A6-9225 852

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 217% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 34
+273%
A6-9225 9

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 273% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 98
+99.8%
A6-9225 49

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 100% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12422
+300%
A6-9225 3103

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 300% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3326
+79.3%
A6-9225 1855

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 79% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 11156
+183%
A6-9225 3936

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 183% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 9760
+222%
A6-9225 3035

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 222% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3480
+81.3%
A6-9225 1920

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9225 by 81% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.30 0.86
Integrated graphics card 4.50 1.17
Recency 26 October 2017 1 June 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9225 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
AMD A6-9225
A6-9225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 105 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2231 vote

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U or A6-9225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.