Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1124 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | 2x AMD Athlon |
Power efficiency | 8.34 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Lion (2008−2009) |
Release date | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 3600 MHz |
Multiplier | 35 | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 29 June 2017 | 1 January 2009 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon X2 QL-64, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon X2 QL-64 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon X2 QL-64, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.