Ryzen 7 7840S vs Ryzen 5 8600G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 8600G outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 415 | 441 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 47.97 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 23.27 | 41.95 |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM5 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 760M | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.59 | 16.10 |
| Integrated graphics card | 14.99 | 18.28 |
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 5 8600G has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
Ryzen 7 7840S, on the other hand, has 21.9% faster integrated GPU, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S.
Note that Ryzen 5 8600G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 7840S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
