EPYC 4564P vs Ryzen 5 8400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.30
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.68
+159%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Ryzen 5 8400F by a whopping 159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 8400F and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking45766
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.4457.25
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency22.2622.08
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$170$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 8400F has 13% better value for money than EPYC 4564P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 8400F and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed4.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm5 nm
Die size178 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors25,000 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 8400F and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8400F and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8400F and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8400F and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8400F and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2028

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 8400F 15.30
EPYC 4564P 39.68
+159%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 8400F 24303
EPYC 4564P 63036
+159%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.30 39.68
Recency 1 April 2024 21 May 2024
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 170 Watt

Ryzen 5 8400F has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 161.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 159.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 8400F in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 8400F is a desktop processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8400F and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 332 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 8400F or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.