Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Ryzen 5 7400
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 7400 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ by a whopping 4892% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 674 | 3402 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 8.16 | 0.30 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | Oakville (2003−2004) |
| Release date | 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago) | August 2004 (21 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7400 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128K |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | no data |
| Die size | 71 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 6,570 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7400 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7400 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7400 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7400 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7400 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.48 | 0.25 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7400 has a 4892% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 7400 is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
