Ryzen 7 7840U vs Ryzen 5 6600U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 6600U
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
10.42
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.74
+51.1%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms Ryzen 5 6600U by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 6600U and Ryzen 7 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking742426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency65.7453.20
Architecture codenameRembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022)Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release dateJanuary 2022 (2 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 6600U and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm4 nm
Die size208 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 6600U and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7FP8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 6600U and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 6600U and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 6600U and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-5600

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 6600U and Ryzen 7 7840U.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 6600U 10.42
Ryzen 7 7840U 15.74
+51.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 6600U 16545
Ryzen 7 7840U 25004
+51.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 6600U 1652
Ryzen 7 7840U 2081
+26%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 6600U 6485
Ryzen 7 7840U 8737
+34.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 5 6600U 6242
Ryzen 7 7840U 6669
+6.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 5 6600U 32097
Ryzen 7 7840U 38490
+19.9%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 5 6600U 9908
Ryzen 7 7840U 12482
+26%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 5 6600U 4.69
Ryzen 7 7840U 3.51
+33.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 5 6600U 17
Ryzen 7 7840U 23
+32%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 6600U 1493
Ryzen 7 7840U 1990
+33.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 6600U 233
Ryzen 7 7840U 264
+13.3%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 6600U 2.73
Ryzen 7 7840U 2.79
+2.2%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 5 6600U 9.3
+10.1%
Ryzen 7 7840U 8.5

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 5 6600U 71
Ryzen 7 7840U 109
+52.3%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 5 6600U 212
Ryzen 7 7840U 237
+11.9%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 5 6600U 6937
+21.2%
Ryzen 7 7840U 5723

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 6600U 7529
Ryzen 7 7840U 9382
+24.6%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 6600U 415
+59.9%
Ryzen 7 7840U 260

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 6600U 1483
Ryzen 7 7840U 1738
+17.2%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 6600U 5486
Ryzen 7 7840U 5952
+8.5%

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 6600U 44320
Ryzen 7 7840U 55145
+24.4%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 6600U 274
+4.6%
Ryzen 7 7840U 262

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.42 15.74
Integrated graphics card 16.29 18.33
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 5 6600U has 86.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7840U, on the other hand, has a 51.1% higher aggregate performance score, 12.5% faster integrated GPU, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 6600U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 6600U and Ryzen 7 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
Ryzen 5 6600U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 98 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 6600U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 241 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 6600U or Ryzen 7 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.