Xeon W-1290TE vs Ryzen 5 5600GT
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon W-1290TE by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 753 | 1021 |
| Place by popularity | 25 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 65.53 | 6.47 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 7.53 | 9.98 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne (2021−2024) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (1 year ago) | 13 May 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $140 | $552 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 5600GT has 913% better value for money than Xeon W-1290TE.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 5600GT and Xeon W-1290TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 206 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 5600GT and Xeon W-1290TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 5600GT and Xeon W-1290TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 5600GT and Xeon W-1290TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 5600GT and Xeon W-1290TE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 5600GT and Xeon W-1290TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 5600GT and Xeon W-1290TE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.50 | 8.21 |
| Integrated graphics card | 6.65 | 5.89 |
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 13 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 10 |
| Threads | 12 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 5 5600GT has a 40.1% higher aggregate performance score, 12.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon W-1290TE, on the other hand, has 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-1290TE in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 5600GT is a desktop processor while Xeon W-1290TE is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
