Celeron G3900E vs Ryzen 5 4500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4500U
2020
6 cores / 6 threads, 15 Watt
6.06
+427%
Celeron G3900E
2016, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.15

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Celeron G3900E by a whopping 427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12432553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.18
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency17.161.40
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date6 January 2020 (5 years ago)2 January 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron G3900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2324
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Die size156 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,800 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron G3900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP6no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron G3900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron G3900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron G3900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron G3900E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 4500U 6.06
+427%
Celeron G3900E 1.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 4500U 10691
+426%
Samples: 2569
Celeron G3900E 2034
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.06 1.15
Integrated graphics card 5.50 1.48
Recency 6 January 2020 2 January 2016
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 4500U has a 427% higher aggregate performance score, 271.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 4500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G3900E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2490 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 4500U and Celeron G3900E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.